Posts: 719
Threads: 64
Joined: Jan 2013
02-18-2013, 02:41 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-18-2013, 02:48 PM by bbrendon.)
Required email authentication on an SMTP client? I've never heard of such a thing. My server system doesn't have authentication. Can it be optional?
Code:
Got an unknown response to the authentication process (503 - 5.5.1 Error: authentication not enabled)
Alternatively I'll request proper authentication per this error:
Code:
Got an unknown response to the authentication process (530 - 5.7.0 Must issue a STARTTLS command first. wm3sm15717280pbc.4 - gsmtp)
LOL. I feel like this is a trick. It doesn't work with or without authentication. Ummm....
--Kill all the serial ports--
Posts: 40,483
Threads: 491
Joined: Aug 2002
I would think that all outgoing mail servers these days would require authentication, for a number of reasons? Even if it's not directly it's often because you are required to authenticate for POP3 receiving before you can send.
But, if you leave the password empty in the account setup, it shouldn't try to do any authentication, or that's how it should be working.
Dean Roddey
Explorans limites defectum
Posts: 719
Threads: 64
Joined: Jan 2013
Nope. Doesn't work with or without auth.
http://imgur.com/DXtBlH8
--Kill all the serial ports--
Posts: 40,483
Threads: 491
Joined: Aug 2002
Oh, I didn't realize the dialog was forcing you to enter it. You may be kind of out of luck until the next drop when I can get this fixed.
Dean Roddey
Explorans limites defectum
Posts: 719
Threads: 64
Joined: Jan 2013
I can wait. In the mean time I'll see if I can figure out how to do SMS.
--Kill all the serial ports--
Posts: 40,483
Threads: 491
Joined: Aug 2002
I updated the dialog not to require the password. I don't have any way to test this, so just give it another try after the next beta drop and see how it's doing.
Dean Roddey
Explorans limites defectum
Posts: 40,483
Threads: 491
Joined: Aug 2002
OK, 4.2.912 has this change, so try it and let me know what happens.
Dean Roddey
Explorans limites defectum
Posts: 719
Threads: 64
Joined: Jan 2013
Works! Yippie!
Code:
Feb 20 20:43:55 servernamehere postfix/smtpd[25548]: connect from unknown[10.2.2.2]
Feb 20 20:43:55 servernamehere postfix/smtpd[25548]: DD7BE4AF681: client=unknown[10.2.2.2]
Feb 20 20:43:55 servernamehere postfix/cleanup[25551]: DD7BE4AF681: message-id=F7558BE2C13A2DAC-4BA0D2ACAF8118E4
Feb 20 20:43:55 servernamehere postfix/qmgr[5190]: DD7BE4AF681: from=<homeauto-noreply@----------.com>, size=362, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Feb 20 20:43:56 servernamehere postfix/smtpd[25548]: disconnect from unknown[10.2.2.2]
Feb 20 20:43:56 servernamehere postfix/smtp[25552]: DD7BE4AF681: to=<-------------->, relay=aspmx.l.google.com[74.125.25.26]:25, delay=0.65, delays=0.09/0/0.12/0.44, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 OK 1361421836 n2si15066787paz.259 - gsmtp)
Feb 20 20:43:56 servernamehere postfix/qmgr[5190]: DD7BE4AF681: removed
--Kill all the serial ports--
Posts: 719
Threads: 64
Joined: Jan 2013
Errr. Pretty sure the RFC says the body is optional
http://imgur.com/UoWrdFe
--Kill all the serial ports--
Posts: 40,483
Threads: 491
Joined: Aug 2002
Yeh, the e-mail support code doesn't require it. I was just assuming, for the purposes of this usage, you'd never send one without passing along some useful info in the body, so the action command requires it. You can probably put in some bogus value for the meantime.
Dean Roddey
Explorans limites defectum
