10-29-2019, 05:58 PM
It's just that, normally with something like this, you have an integration id which is the thing itself, and then if it has multiple sub-thingies inside it, those are component ids. So a light has a zero component id because there's just a light. A keypad has an integration id then the LEDs inside it have component ids (with a particular LED being addressed by a combination of the two.) But it looks like the visor thing itself is not separately addressable and you just give integration ids directly to the various bits inside it.
It's just inconsistent relative to the way the other bits work, so I was questioning whether I was reading it right.
It's just inconsistent relative to the way the other bits work, so I was questioning whether I was reading it right.
Dean Roddey
Explorans limites defectum
Explorans limites defectum