![]() |
Official 5.3 Beta Discussion Thread - Printable Version +- Charmed Quark Systems, Ltd. - Support Forums and Community (https://www.charmedquark.com/vb_forums) +-- Forum: General Discussion (https://www.charmedquark.com/vb_forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Beta Discussions (https://www.charmedquark.com/vb_forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=12) +--- Thread: Official 5.3 Beta Discussion Thread (/showthread.php?tid=10397) |
RE: Official 5.3 Beta Discussion Thread - Dean Roddey - 07-02-2018 (07-02-2018, 07:52 PM)IVB Wrote: Do you think that networking issue would be the reason a 2ndary server would show fields in black, but the MS shows it in red?It would be the most likely reason. If you done click one of them on each machine, what do they show as driver status? On the secondary driver, open the CQC Command Prompt, and do the usual: CQCNetTest > nt.txt and post the nt.txt file. That will show us what is going on from the secondary in terms of connectivity. RE: Official 5.3 Beta Discussion Thread - Dean Roddey - 07-02-2018 (07-02-2018, 06:15 PM)bigdude Wrote: I updated to 5.2.914 when you updated the ISY driver.  That guy works great, but I've been having another serious problem now.  My triggered events work great for a few days then they stop working.  If I cycle the CQC app shell they'll start working again. I can watch the Event Triggers Monitor and the events show up with the correct source and useract. For example, when I arm my alarm system, the "SecurityArmed" User Triggered Event is supposed to fire.  And it does for a few days then stops even though the events keep registering on the monitor.  In fact, all triggered events stop working. Scheduled events work fine. I've checked that none of the triggered events are in a "Paused" state even though they really shouldn't have become that way. Definitely upgrade to the latest. Lots of small things have been fixed. I wouldn't do fast pause/resume operations on events. That mechanism isn't meant for that sort of thing, and it's possible that the event server might get out of sync with the actual configuration. When you restart it, then that makes it read everything back out from the master server again and that would get it back into sync until you freaked it out again. Definitely use a disabling field for something like that. RE: Official 5.3 Beta Discussion Thread - IVB - 07-02-2018 (07-02-2018, 09:15 PM)Dean Roddey Wrote:(07-02-2018, 07:52 PM)IVB Wrote: Do you think that networking issue would be the reason a 2ndary server would show fields in black, but the MS shows it in red?It would be the most likely reason. If you done click one of them on each machine, what do they show as driver status? rebooting the MS got it back, will try this next time. This is a tiny, atom-based unit that I got for $180 off Amazon, wouldn't shock me if there are other settings somewhere I need to change. RE: Official 5.3 Beta Discussion Thread - Dean Roddey - 07-03-2018 I put up a build for 5.3. I won't post it for a day or so yet. If you guys want to go ahead and upgrade, go for it. If no one has any issues, I'll post it. http://www.charmedquark.com/Web2/Downloads/Installers/CQCInstSE_5_3_0.exe I did some trailing small fixes, which are: 5.3.0
RE: Official 5.3 Beta Discussion Thread - IVB - 07-03-2018 ok will upgrade shortly. Where does the device support for the additional zWave stuff listed above fit into your future plans? No pressure, just curious. I'm contemplating also replicating to my VRCOP and having 2 device drivers, 2 controllers, as right now half my devices aren't supported by the V3. I'm also going to disconnect the ISY and list it for sale, that will be a nice day. 3.5 years later, ISY V5 is still in *alpha*! RE: Official 5.3 Beta Discussion Thread - Dean Roddey - 07-03-2018 It was too late to do those for this release. Once I get 5.3 out officially, a couple days at most I think, I can get back to adding new unit support. Nothing disruptive will be done for a bit after the release, since there is almost always an inevitable follow up release to deal with small stuff that wasn't caught during testing. So it'll be safe enough to grab those post-release betas in order to get the new unit support. RE: Official 5.3 Beta Discussion Thread - IVB - 07-03-2018 ok cool. Sounds like I really should add the VRCOP back in, so I can control all my devices. RE: Official 5.3 Beta Discussion Thread - batwater - 07-05-2018 Dean, I just upgraded to 5.3 yesterday. Today just deleted everything, factory reset Aeon stick, did a join to my SmartThings hub, getting ad infinitum dialog box stating: "7 is not a valid value for enumeration tZWaveUSB3Sh::EDrvStates" RE: Official 5.3 Beta Discussion Thread - batwater - 07-05-2018 Okay, I managed to get one of the Linear WADWAZ-1 door units to get properly configured but the driver is not picking up the values properly from the device and showing ??? instead of filling the fields in. Steps: 1) follow my published VRC0P manual association method to associate WADWAZ-1 to Aeon Stick. 2) Pause the CQC driver 3) Fire up Zentools and trigger a replication (include/exclude button (replication) from CQC does not work) 4) start CQC driver 5) in client side driver enable the device by rescanning the device (I disabled all battery devices not properly working) 6) wake the device up 7) approve device Here's the trace of me opening and closing the door sensor: Z-Wave USB3 Trace , Time: 10:07:53 AM ---------------------------------------------------- 10:08:01 - [ZW->DR] - REQ,Msg:AppCmd/0x4,Recvd: 10:08:01) { Flags: Type: Single SrcId: 3 Class: Basic Cmd: Set Bytes: 00 03 03 20 01 FF } 10:08:01 - [TRACE]- Processing app cmd. Src=3, Class=20, Cmd=1 10:08:10 - [ZW->DR] - REQ,Msg:AppCmd/0x4,Recvd: 10:08:10) 9498MSs { Flags: Type: Single SrcId: 3 Class: Basic Cmd: Set Bytes: 00 03 03 20 01 00 } 10:08:10 - [TRACE]- Processing app cmd. Src=3, Class=20, Cmd=1 RE: Official 5.3 Beta Discussion Thread - batwater - 07-05-2018 Super, I just tried again to replicate from CQC and it worked. Love the consistency... Not pointing figure at the driver, could be SmartThings hub not responding correctly, dunno. |