Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thoughts about a post-3.1 world
#11
There will be various schemes. Where possible it will just automatically do it, by knowing the well defined possible values of the virtual field (based on the semantic type selected) and the advertised range of the source field.

Where that's not possible, a set of configurable options will be available (based on the data type of the field) to handle the mapping yourself.

Yeh it might not be tick accurate in all cases, but the alternative is generally far worse of non-portability. And of course you don't have to work at the virtual level if you don't want. It'll be a purely optional thing. It's just another driver and if you feel strongly that this or that field or driver needs to be dealt with directly, there's nothing stopping anyone from 'mixing modes' if they want to and doing some stuff via the virtual layer and some directly to the actual driver.
Dean Roddey
Software Geek Extraordinaire
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Some early thoughts on 5.4 Dean Roddey 37 520 07-11-2018, 11:00 PM
Last Post: Dean Roddey
  Post 3.1 Quirks/Wish List jrlewis 162 20,805 09-20-2010, 04:03 AM
Last Post: batwater
  RIVA Web Image Widget support thoughts/questions for post-3.1 SamVimes2 3 1,697 02-01-2010, 06:33 AM
Last Post: wuench
  A post-3.0 idea to work out... Dean Roddey 51 10,392 07-06-2009, 03:08 PM
Last Post: Dean Roddey
  Official Post-2.0.14 beta thread Dean Roddey 110 18,038 03-17-2007, 10:16 AM
Last Post: Dean Roddey
  Post 2.0 Feature Requests zaccari 174 22,289 02-25-2007, 05:51 PM
Last Post: Dean Roddey

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)